Anatomical variations of caecal appendix on tomography, a retrospective study

Variaciones anatómicas del apéndice cecal en tomografía, un estudio retrospectivo

Contenido principal del artículo

Laura De Leon
Jesus De León Martínez

Resumen




Introduction: the most common surgical cause of abdominal pain is appendicitis; its diagnosis is affected by anatomical variations of the vermiform appendix, because this is the most variable abdominal organ in terms of position and organ relations. Objective: to determine the characteristics of the normal appendix in computed tomography scans, including length, diameter, wall thickness, and the location of the base and the appendicular tip. Methods: abdominal computed tomography scans with UroCT scan protocol images were studied to measure length, width, and diameter of the appendix, and to identify the locations of its base and tip. The appendicular tip location was categorized as anterior or posterior and subdivided into: pelvic, retrocaecal/retrocolic, postileal, paracolic, subcaecal, subhepatic or midline. The appendicular base location was defined in three planes in relation to the ileocaecal valve: anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, or superior-inferior. Results: were included the abdominal tomography images of 83 patients in which general characteristics of the appendix were determined: a mean length of 78 mm (SD = ±23.41) and a mean diameter of 6.55 mm (SD =± 1.77) were observed. The bases were more frequently located inferior posterior, lateral and medial, to the ileocaecal valve, and the tips were more frequently located in the pelvic cavity, followed by the retrocaecal and paracaecal location. Conclusions: the locations of the base of the appendix were correlated with overall reports. There was no correlation between the tip location and the length of the appendix, this means that, even if the appendix is long, it is not associated with a tip location further from the ileocaecal valve.




Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Biografía del autor/a (VER)

Jesus De León Martínez, Medihelp Services Clinic

Department of Radiology, Medihelp Services Clinic, Cartagena, Colombia.

Palabras clave:

Referencias (VER)

1. Snyder MJ, Guthrie M, Cagle S. Acute appendicitis: Efficient diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2018; 98(1): 25–33.

2. Cabrera-Rivera PA, Posso-Valencia HJ, Dennis-Verano RJ. Clinical and cost benefits of a standardization model in the management of acute appendicitis. Rev Colomb Cir. 2021; 36(2): 283–300.

3. Monsonis B, Mandoul C, Millet I, Taourel P. Imaging of appendicitis: Tips and tricks. Eur J Radiol. 2020; 130:

4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109165

5. Banerjee A, Kumar IA, Tapadar A, Pranay M. Morphological Variations in the Anatomy of Caecum and Appendix - A Cadaveric Study. Natl J Clin Anat. 2012 Jan 23; 01(01): 030–5. Available from: http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0039-3401654

6. Zacharzewska-Gondek A, Szczurowska A, Guziński M, Sąsiadek M, Bladowska J. A pictorial essay of the most atypical variants of the vermiform appendix position in computed tomography with their possible clinical implications. Polish J Radiol. 2019; 84: e1–8.

7. Ghorbani A, Forouzesh M, Kazemifar AM. Variation in Anatomical Position of V ermiform Appendix among Iranian Population: An Old Issue Which Has Not Lost Its Importance. Anat Res Int. 2014 Sep 10; 2014: 1–4. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ari/2014/313575/

8. JM W, W M, JL C. Does this patient have appendicitis? JAMA. 1996; 276(19): 1589–94.

9. Johnson PT, Eng J, Moore CJ, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multidetector-row CT of the appendix in healthy adults. Emerg Radiol. 2006; 12(6): 248–53.

10. Mwachaka P, El-busaidy H, Sinkeet S, Ogeng’o J. Variations in the Position and Length of the Vermiform Appendix in a Black Kenyan Population. ISRN Anat. 2014 Apr 30; 2014: 1–5. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2014/871048/

11. Charoensak A, Pongpornsup S, Suthikeeree W. Wall thickness and outer diameter of the normal appendix in adults using 64 slices multidetector CT. J Med Assoc Thail. 2010; 93(12): 1437–42.

12. Baird DLH, Simillis C, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. Acute appendicitis. BMJ. 2017; 357: j1703.

13. Kabir SA, Kabir SI, Sun R, Jafferbhoy S, Karim A. How to diagnose an acutely inflamed appendix; a systematic review of the latest evidence. Int J Surg. 2017; 40: 155– 62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.013

14. Demir MK, Savas Y, Furuncuoglu Y, Cevher T, Demiral S, Tabandeh B, et al. Imaging Findings of the Unusual Presentations, Associations and Clinical Mimics of Acute Appendicitis. Eurasian J Med [Internet]. 2017 Oct 25; 49(3): 198–203. Available from: https://www.eajm.org//en/imaging-findings-of-the-unusual-presentations-associations-and-clinical-mimics-of-acute-appendicitis-132995

15. Whitley S, Sookur P, McLean A, Power N. The Appendix on CT. Clin Radiol. 2009; 64(2): 190–9.

16. Pinto P, N PL, Jm P, Cunha R, Pinto P. CT Evaluation of Appendicitis and Its Complications : Am Roentgen Ray Soc. 2005; 185 (August): 406–17.

17. Giovanni E, Gómez C, Luis P, Porras F, Uribe LA, Camargo DB. Posición anatómica y longitud del apéndice vermiforme en una población de raza mestiza de la ciudad de Bucaramanga - Colombia. 2009; 55: 116–20.

18. Barlow A, Muhleman M, Gielecki J, Matusz P, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. The vermiform appendix: A review. Clin Anat . 2013 May; 842. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.22269

19. Willekens I, Peeters E, De Maeseneer M, de Mey J. The Normal Appendix on CT: Does Size Matter? Lo AW, editor. PLoS One. 2014 May 6; 9(5): e96476. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096476

20. Wakeley CPG. The Position of the Vermiform Appendix as Ascertained by an Analysis of 10,000 Cases. J Anat. 1933; 67(Pt 2): 277–83.

Contadores