Consistencia interna de la escala para discriminación mayor en estudiantes de medicina.
Internal consistency of the major discrimination scale in medicine students.
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Introducción: la Escala para Discriminación Mayor (EDM) es un instrumento de nueve puntos para cuantificar las situaciones de discriminación ─alguna vez en la vida─. En los Estados Unidos, la EDM mostró una alta confiabilidad, aunque, la confiabilidad se debe conocer en colectivos colombianos. Objetivo: estimar la consistencia interna de la EDM en los estudiantes de Medicina de Bucaramanga-Colombia. Materiales y métodos: un total de 361 estudiantes de Medicina completaron la EMD. La media para la edad de los participantes fue 20.1 años (DE=1.9); el 59.6% de los estudiantes eran mujeres. La confiabilidad se calculó con el coeficiente de Kuder-Richardson (K-R) y la omega McDonald. Resultados: la EMD mostró alta consistencia interna, coeficiente K-R de 0.76 y omega de McDonald de 0.85. Conclusión: la EMD es un instrumento con alta consistencia interna en estudiantes de Medicina de Bucaramanga-Colombia. Se puede usar este instrumento para la investigación de experiencias mayores de discriminación en estudiantes de Medicina.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Hatzenbuehler ML, Phelan JC, Link BG. Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. Am J Public health. 2013; 103: 813-21. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301069
Chen J. Perceived discrimination and subjective well-being among rural-to-urban migrants in China. J Social Soc Welfare. 2013; 40: 131-56.
Paradies Y. A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health. Int J Epidemiol. 2006; 35: 888-901. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl056
Pascoe EA, Smart L. Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135: 531-54. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016059
Helms JE. Some better practices for measuring racial and ethnic identity constructs. J Counsel Psychol. 2007; 54: 235-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.235
Sartorius N, Gaetbel W, Cleveland H-R, Stuart H, Akiyama T, Arboleda-Flórez J, et al. WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists. World Psychiatry 2010; 9: 131-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00296.x
Alvarez-Galvez J, Salvador-Carulla L. Perceived discrimination and self-rated health in Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey (2010). PloS One. 2013; 8: e74252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074252
Goto J, Couto P, Bastos J. Revisão sistemática dos estudos epidemiológicos sobre discriminação interpessoal e saúde mental. Cad Saude Publica. 2013; 29: 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2013000300004
Krieger N. Methods for the scientific study of discrimination and health: an ecosocial approach. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 936-45. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300544
Jones KP, Peddie CI, Gilrane VL, King EB, Gray AL. Not so subtle. A meta-analytic investigation of the correlates of subtle and overt discrimination. J Manag. 2013 (ahead of print).
Kressin NR, Raymond KL, Manze M. Perceptions of race/ethnicity-based discrimination: a review of measures and evaluation of their usefulness for the health care setting. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008; 19: 697-730. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0041
Mora-Rios J, Bautista-Aguilar N, Natera G, Pedersen D. Adaptación cultural de instrumentos de medida sobre estigma y enfermedad mental en la Ciudad de México. Salud Mental. 2013; 36: 9-18. https://doi.org/10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2013.002
Grey JA, Robinson BBE, Coleman E, Bockting WO. A systematic review of instruments that measure attitudes toward homosexual men. J Sex Res. 2013; 50: 329-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.746279
Williams DR, Yu Y, Jackson JS, Anderson NB. Racial differences in physical and mental health socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. J Health Psychol. 1997; 2: 335-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539700200305
Kessler RC, Mickelson KD, Williams DR. The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. J Health Soc Behav. 1999; 40: 208-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676349
Blacker D, Endicott J. Psychometric properties: concepts of reliability and validity. In: Handbook of psychiatric measures. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2002.
Sánchez R, Echeverry J. Validación de escalas de medición en salud. Rev Salud Publica. 2004; 6: 302-318. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642004000300006
Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: la consistencia interna. Rev Salud Pública. 2008; 10: 831-839. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642008000500015
Cronbach J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika. 1951; 16: 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
McDonald RP. Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1970; 23: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00432.x
Resolución 008430 por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Ministerio de salud; 1993.
Sousa VM, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17: 268-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
Clark MJ. Cross-cultural research: Challenge and competence. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012; 18 (Suppl. 2): 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02026.x
Kuder GF, Richardson MV. The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika. 1937; 2: 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391
STATA 9.0 for windows. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2005.
Oviedo HC, Campo-Arias A. Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2005; 34: 572-580.
Hunte HE, King K, Hicken M, Lee H, Lewis TT. Interpersonal discrimination and depressive symptomatology: examination of several personality-related characteristics as potential confounders in a racial/ethnic heterogeneous adult sample. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 1084. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1084
Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. Clinical epidemiology. The essentials. Fourth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. Am J Med. 2006; 119: 166.e7-166.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
Sullivan GM. A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. J Grad Med Educ. 2011; 3: 119-120. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-11-00075.1
Citado por
